Mad council decisions, part 40 Is this
another ridiculous application of the Resource Management
Act (RMA) asks Federated Farmers, this time it's about
resource consent to remove pasture weeds.
"From
the same council that threatened to prosecute a farmer
for not discharging effluent to water, comes the need
for a resource consent to remove a weed," says Lyn Neeson,
Federated Farmers Ruapehu provincial president.
"While we appreciate the generous offer of free, on
the spot consents, it seriously begs the question if
Horizons has too many staff in its enforcement team.
"Then again Horizons is sticking to the letter of the
law and not its principal.
"It'll argue this
is to protect regenerating native scrub, given farmers need
permission to clear two hectares of contiguous scrub and I
get that. I also get the need for consent to clear scrub
with 70 percent canopy cover.
"But farmers
aren't talking about clearing regenerating native forest
or stands of mature manuka. No, it's about clearing
immature manuka on pasture land, using helicopters
and grass friendly chemicals.
"To produce
succulent beef and lamb in the North Island's high country
we need green grass, not woody vegetation.
"What deeply concerns me is that hill country farmers
have been threatened with prosecution for spraying done up
to seven years ago. On one hand Horizons claims voluntary
sign ups make it a success but on the other, it's spraying
farmers with abatement notices.
"It's really
frustrating when a regulatory authority makes rules with
little or no understanding of how farms are actually run.
This is the case with Horizons latest ‘mad decision'
requiring resource consent for normal farm and pasture
management," Mrs Neeson concluded.
ENDS